A ‘targeted’ $1,400 stimulus check: Every way that could happen, and why
What’s a “targeted” stimulus payment and why do some people want it? We’ll explain, along with how certain changes could limit who gets a third check.
The word “targeted” has entered the, adding an undercurrent of limitation to a that could send . And that’s exactly the problem with a that proponents of “targeting” are trying to avoid.
“We need to target that money. So, folks making $300,000 don’t get any windfall,” President Joe Biden said Friday about his strategy for a, which would include the . “If you’re a family that’s a two-wage earner, each of the parents — one making 30 grand and one making 40 or 50 … Well, yeah, they need the money, and they’re going to get it.”
Behind the momentum to limit recipients is abased various factors, like , , the equation’s “ ,” and arbitrary income limits. Congress sets the latter two. We’ll explain what the objection is to a , how it could potentially become more targeted and how , which could allow millions to either receive a or , fit in. We continue to update this story with new information.
Here’s how a new bill could target the next stimulus check
Earlier this week, a group of 10 moderate Republicans proposed a $600 billion GOP plan with a $1,000 check. While Biden has rejected that, he does seem to embrace the idea that the highest income earners should not get a stimulus check. Below, we’ll go over exactly why lawmakers would potentially want to target the next payment and how each change would work on its own.
- Supply a lower check maximum than $1,400 (this works on two levels). Note that Biden has said he’s set on the $1,400 amount.
- Lower the for the full stimulus check amount from $75,000 per individual and $150,000 per married couple.
- Enforce a cutoff to the for receiving a payment (dependents add another dimension).
- Change the “reduction rate” in the to reduce the number of people who would get a partial payment.
Why some want a more ‘targeted’ stimulus check to begin with
If the $1,400-per-person stimulus check were to follow the exact, people who are considered high income would get all or part of the maximum payment, in addition to tens of millions of people who fit the sweet spot that Congress actively wants to supply with stimulus money.
For the first two checks, that was defined as single taxpayers with anof $75,000 per year or less (and their equivalent for heads of household and married couples). A new Democratic view could adjust that so people who earn less than $50,000 a year as a single taxpayer or $100,000 per year as a married couple would get the full $1,400 and $2,800, respectively (that’s without dependents — here’s .)
But without limiting who else would get the payment, the, raising the maximum to $1,400 could authorize checks to people who make “too much money.” The formula that’s currently in use was written into the respective stimulus bills in a way that provides a partial payment to people who make more than the $75,000 per year threshold, up to a certain upper cap.
Looking at, and proposed $1,400 checks, it’s immediately clear how raising or lowering the per-person maximum — e.g. $1,400 versus $600 — can change the total number of people over the $75,000 income limit who could be eligible for a payment.
For example, using our, a single taxpayer with an AGI below $75,000 would receive the full $1,400 check. At $85,000, this person could receive $1,150; at $90,000 a year, they could get $650; and if they make $102,900, the Treasury would send a stimulus check for $5.
In contrast, aallots a single taxpayer with an AGI of $80,000 a stimulus check for $350. The same person who makes $86,900 a year would get only a $5 check.
The result is that, with the current formula, more people would be eligible overall to receive a stimulus check of some amount with a $1,400 maximum, even if it’s a relatively small payment.and spouses add another layer — here’s .
The new check could exclude earners over a certain income
The GOP proposal illustrates this concept well. It seeks to exclude single taxpayers who make more than $50,000 per person and couples making $100,000 from receiving a stimulus check — full stop. People with anless than $40,000 and families earning less than $80,000 would receive the full amount, and everyone in between would get something, but less than $1,000.
Dependents of any age would count toward the $500, which does complicate the issue, but the thrust behind the GOP’s argument is to keep people who make more than the “desired” or “targeted” salary from receiving stimulus money.
It could lower the number of people receiving the full amount
One way to send a check to fewer people would be instituting a firm cutoff. For example, you can’t get a check if you make more than a certain amount of money per year, period. Another, related but different option, is to lower the number of people who get the full check amount. One proposal embraced by some Democrats, according to The Washington Post, would begin phasing out recipients who make $50,000 a year or more.
Say you have a $1,400 check, and people who make under $50,000 are the only ones who would receive the full amount. People with an AGI over that amount would receive a partial payment (up to a certain point) — which would also peter out quicker for people with relatively higher incomes. That calculation would keep the highest earners from receiving a stimulus check for any quantity.
More people would get a partial check than with the $600 billion package proposal, but far fewer would receive stimulus money than with a phase-out starting at $75,000 a year.
Dropping the per-person maximum could cut payments overall
Let’s say for the sake of argument that the $600 billion GOP proposal were adopted and a $1,000 stimulus check instead of $1,400 were sent. Even if no other changes were made to the formula or to the income limit, lowering the amount would automatically disqualify more people simply because of the way the math works out.
For example, the drop from the first $1,200 stimulus payment to the $600 second stimulus checkwho had otherwise qualified for the first stimulus check. Simply using a $600 base instead of $1,200 reduced the cutoff point for receiving a partial payment.
Said another way, the smaller the per-person maximum, the sooner people who made more than $75,000 a year hit the limit for receiving any money.
With the first check, a single taxpayer — remember, no spouse or kids — could get some amount of stimulus money if they made less than $99,000. With the second check, that vanishing point dropped to $87,000. The only difference in that part of the equation was the maximum per-person payment. (Separately,counted for $600 in the second check instead of $500.)
As another illustration of the effects of the base payment, the first stimulus check went out to around 160 million people, while the second payment reached an estimated 147 million households, despite more groups of people qualifying for the second check. Likewise, a $1,000 payment would reacheven if that were the sole change to Biden’s proposal.
What happens if the stimulus calculation changed?
Changing the math in theused for the first two checks would be one way to limit the number of people who receive a check. It’s a method that the GOP pitch proposed, in addition to other measures. Let’s just look at this one on its own — for the sake of argument, let’s assume that the final bill would keep the $1,400 maximum and the income threshold at $75,000.
Adjusting the part of the formula that controls partial payments could result in people who make more than $75,000 per year hitting the vanishing point to get some amount of stimulus money, even with a $1,400 maximum payment, resulting in fewer checks going out overall.
For example, the current formula would give a person with an AGI of $80,000 a year a $1,150 stimulus check. The GOP bill suggests an adjustment to the formula that would reduce your share by 10% instead of 5% for every $1,000 in income.
Therefore, the more you earn, the less money you could receive, at a higher rate than the current formula. That would effectively mean that people who are relatively high earners would get a much smaller check or none at all.
How would new qualifying groups factor in?
In addition to supporting larger stimulus checks,two previously excluded groups: (not just children under 17) and all . Combined, that could potentially extend stimulus funds to nearly 20 million people who previously might not have been counted toward the family total. The $600 billion GOP proposal would allot $500 to dependents of any age.
If passed, the outcome would most likely be a larger stimulus check for families that previously qualified (in the case of 17-year-olds anddependents), and some mixed-status families qualifying for a new check for the first time. In all cases, families would have to meet all other eligibility requirements — like an income limit — to receive a future stimulus check.
Until negotiations begin in earnest, we’ll have to see how the stimulus bill and third stimulus check develop. For more information, here’s theand here’s what to know about . Here’s what to do if .
Mandy Elliot started working for The Limited Press in 2020. Mandy grew up in a small town in northern Tennessee. But moved to New York for university. Before joining The Limited Press, Mandy briefly worked as a freelance journalist for several radio stations. She covers politics and economy stories.